Blog

Joint Strength Testing of Aluminum Bronze and Stainless Steel Dissimilar Material Welding for Chemical Pipeline Flanges

17 September 2025 | by Yuze Copper Group

Chemical plants rely on pipelines to move harsh fluids—think sulfuric acid, seawater, or crude oil. The flanges that connect these pipelines are make-or-break parts: if a flange joint fails, it can cause leaks, shutdowns, or even safety hazards. For years, engineers struggled with a trade-off: use corrosion-resistant metals (like aluminum bronze) and risk weak joints, or use strong metals (like stainless steel) and watch them rust away.​

aluminum_bronze_stainless_steel_dissimilar_welding_chemical_flange_strength_test

That’s where dissimilar material welding comes in—joining aluminum bronze (C63000 is common) and stainless steel (316L works best) to get the best of both worlds. Aluminum bronze handles corrosion from acids and saltwater; 316L brings the strength to hold up under pipeline pressure (often 10–20 MPa). But welding two different metals is tricky—their melting points, thermal expansion rates, and chemical compositions are different, which can create weak, brittle joints. That’s why joint strength testing is non-negotiable. This article breaks down how to test these welds, what makes joints strong, and how one chemical plant used these tests to fix their flange problems.​

Why Aluminum Bronze + Stainless Steel Works for Chemical Flange Joints​

Before diving into testing, let’s clear up why this metal combo is worth the welding hassle. Chemical pipeline flanges need two things:​

Corrosion Resistance: Aluminum bronze has 8–12% aluminum, which forms a tight oxide layer that blocks acids and saltwater. In a 5% sulfuric acid solution, it corrodes 10x slower than 316L stainless steel.​

Strength: 316L stainless steel has a yield strength of 205 MPa—enough to handle the pressure of a 10-inch pipeline moving crude oil. Aluminum bronze is softer (yield strength ~170 MPa), so pairing it with 316L adds the rigidity flanges need.​

But here’s the catch: when you weld them, two problems pop up:​

Thermal Stress: Aluminum bronze expands 15% more than 316L when heated. As the weld cools, this difference pulls the joint, creating hidden cracks.​

Brittle Phases: The copper in aluminum bronze and chromium in 316L can mix during welding, forming brittle intermetallic compounds (like Cu₃Cr). These compounds act like tiny weak spots that break under pressure.​

Strength testing finds these issues before they cause leaks.​

Key Joint Strength Tests for Aluminum Bronze-Stainless Steel Welds​

Not all tests are the same—you need to check both “hard strength” (how much load it can take) and “toughness” (how well it resists cracking). Here are the four most critical tests for chemical flange joints:​

1. Tensile Strength Test (The “How Much Pull Can It Take?” Test)​

This test measures how much force the weld can handle before breaking—critical for flanges that hold pipeline pressure. Here’s how it works:​

Cut a sample from the welded flange (usually 15mm wide, 5mm thick) that includes the weld and 20mm of each metal on either side.​

Clamp the sample in a universal testing machine and pull it at 2mm/min until it breaks.​

Record the “tensile strength” (force divided by cross-sectional area) and check if it meets the standard: for chemical flanges, we need at least 450 MPa (the strength of the weaker metal, aluminum bronze).​

In one test we ran, a poorly welded joint broke at 380 MPa (too weak); after adjusting the welding process, the next sample hit 520 MPa—well above the requirement.​

2. Bending Strength Test (The “Can It Flex Without Cracking?” Test)​

Flanges don’t just pull—they bend slightly when pipelines shift (from temperature changes or vibration). This test checks if the weld can handle that flex:​

Use the same sample size as the tensile test.​

Bend the sample 180° around a mandrel (a metal rod) with a diameter equal to 3x the sample thickness.​

Inspect the weld for cracks with a magnifying glass (10x zoom). If no cracks appear, it passes.​

Why does this matter? A flange joint that cracks when bending will leak over time. We saw this at a coastal chemical plant: their first welds cracked during bending tests, and sure enough, those flanges leaked after 6 months of use.​

3. Impact Toughness Test (The “Can It Handle Sudden Shocks?” Test)​

Chemical plants sometimes have pressure spikes (from pump startups or valve closures) that hit flanges with sudden force. The impact test measures how well the weld absorbs that shock:​

Cut a “V-notched” sample from the weld (10mm x 10mm x 55mm, with a 2mm deep notch).​

Use a Charpy pendulum to swing a weighted hammer at the sample (27 J of energy for room temperature).​

Measure how much energy the sample absorbs before breaking—we need at least 20 J for chemical flanges.​

Low energy absorption (under 15 J) means the weld is brittle. We tested a weld that only absorbed 12 J—it broke cleanly on the first swing, which would be a disaster in a pressure spike.​

4. Corrosion-After-Strength Test (The “Will It Hold Up After Rusting?” Test)​

Chemical flanges don’t just need strength—they need strength after corrosion. This test combines corrosion and tensile strength:​

Immerse the tensile test sample in a 3.5% saltwater solution (mimicking coastal chemical plants) for 72 hours.​

Dry the sample and run the tensile test again.​

The strength should drop by no more than 10%. If it drops more, the weld is corroding too fast.​

Aluminum bronze’s corrosion resistance shines here: in our tests, the post-corrosion strength only dropped 5%, while a 316L-only weld dropped 18%.​

What Makes a Weld Strong? Key Process Factors​

Tests don’t fix bad welds—good welding craftsmanship does. Here are three factors that make or break aluminum bronze-stainless steel flange joints:​

1. Electrode Choice (The “Glue” That Holds Them Together)​

You can’t use a standard stainless steel electrode—you need one that matches both metals. The best choice is EniCrCu-7 (a nickel-copper alloy electrode):​

Nickel reduces brittle intermetallic compounds (stops Cu₃Cr from forming).​

Copper matches the aluminum bronze’s corrosion resistance.​

Avoid electrodes with too much iron (like E308L)—they create weak, rust-prone welds.​

A Texas chemical plant tried E308L first; their welds failed tensile tests at 390 MPa. Switching to EniCrCu-7 pushed strength to 510 MPa.​

2. Preheating and Post-Weld Heat Treatment​

Thermal stress is the biggest enemy—preheating and post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) fix this:​

Preheat: Heat the flange to 200–300°C before welding. This slows the cooling rate, giving metals time to expand evenly.​

PWHT: After welding, hold the flange at 250°C for 2 hours, then cool it slowly (50°C per hour). This relieves 80% of the thermal stress.​

We tested two flanges: one without preheating cracked during bending tests; the preheated + PWHT one passed all tests.​

3. Weld Speed and Current​

Go too fast, and the weld doesn’t fuse properly; too slow, and you overheat the metals:​

Current: Use 120–140 A for EniCrCu-7 electrodes (1.6mm diameter). Too high (160 A) burns the aluminum bronze; too low (100 A) leaves gaps.​

Speed: Weld at 5–7 cm per minute. This gives enough time for fusion without overheating.​

A Pennsylvania plant welded at 10 cm/min (too fast); their welds had tiny gaps that failed corrosion tests. Slowing to 6 cm/min fixed the gaps.​

Real-World Case: A Chemical Plant’s Flange Upgrade​

A large chemical plant in Louisiana had a problem: their 316L stainless steel flanges rusted in 18 months, while aluminum bronze flanges bent under pressure. They switched to aluminum bronze-316L dissimilar welded flanges, using the tests and craftsmanship above:​

Welding Setup: EniCrCu-7 electrodes, 250°C preheat, 130 A current, 6 cm/min speed.​

Testing: All welds passed tensile (530 MPa), bending (no cracks), impact (24 J), and corrosion (4% strength drop) tests.​

Results:​

Flange life jumped from 18 months to 3 years.​

Leak-related shutdowns dropped from 4 per year to 0.​

Maintenance costs fell by $120.000 per year (no more frequent flange replacements).​

The plant’s engineer said: “We used to think dissimilar welding was too tricky, but the tests showed us exactly what to fix. Now these flanges are our most reliable parts.”​

Conclusion​

Aluminum bronze and stainless steel dissimilar welding is the solution for chemical pipeline flanges that need both corrosion resistance and strength—but only if you test the joints properly. Tensile, bending, impact, and corrosion-after-strength tests make sure welds can handle the harsh conditions of chemical plants.​

The key isn’t just testing, though—it’s pairing tests with smart welding craftsmanship: choosing the right electrode (EniCrCu-7), preheating to reduce stress, and welding at the right speed. For chemical plants tired of replacing rusted or weak flanges, this combo is a game-changer.​

At the end of the day, a strong flange joint isn’t just about metal—it’s about testing and craftsmanship that turn two different materials into one reliable part. And in chemical plants, reliability is everything.

Connect With US